back
to
India map
Tamil Nadu, India
Attainable yield and nutrient deficits
The nutrient
omission plot technique was used to determine attainable yield
with full fertilization and nutrient-limited yields. Table 1
shows the results in 2002 to 2004. Rice grain yield in plots
fully fertilized with N, P, and K, provided an estimate of the
attainable yield target. The yield of rice not fertilized with
N, but fertilized with other nutrients, was used to determine
N-limited yield. Similarly, the yield of rice not fertilized
with P, but receiving other nutrients, indicated P-limited
yield; and the yield of rice not fertilized with K, but
receiving other nutrients, indicated K-limited yield. The
difference between the yield target and a nutrient-limited yield
indicated the crop response to the nutrient. Crop response to P
averaged <0.5 t ha−1 in both the Old and New Delta
for both kuruvai and thaladi seasons. Crop response to K
averaged 0.5 t ha−1 for both kuruvai and thaladi in
the Old Delta and >0.5 t ha−1 for both seasons in the
New Delta.
Table 1.
Attainable yield and nutrient deficits in the Old and New Delta
in Tamil Nadu, 2002 to 2004.
Values
shown are means and standard deviation (SD) of 25–40 farms
per location and season.
|
Location and parameter |
Kuruvai
(dry
season) |
|
Thaladi
(wet
season) |
|
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Old Delta (Aduthurai District) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attainable yield target; yield with NPK (t ha−1) |
6.2 |
0.8 |
|
6.2 |
0.5 |
|
N-limited yield; yield without N fertilizer (t ha−1) |
3.9 |
0.6 |
|
3.8 |
0.6 |
|
P-limited yield; yield without P fertilizer (t ha−1) |
5.9 |
0.8 |
|
5.8 |
0.5 |
|
K-limited yield; yield without K fertilizer (t ha−1) |
5.7 |
0.8 |
|
5.7 |
0.5 |
|
Yield
response to N (t ha−1) |
2.3 |
0.6 |
|
2.4 |
0.8 |
|
Yield
response to P (t ha−1) |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
0.3 |
|
Yield
response to K (t ha−1) |
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
New Delta (Thanjavur District) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attainable yield target; yield with NPK (t ha−1) |
6.5 |
0.8 |
|
6.2 |
0.5 |
|
N-limited yield; yield without N fertilizer (t ha−1) |
4.1 |
1.0 |
|
3.9 |
0.6 |
|
P-limited yield; yield without P fertilizer (t ha−1) |
6.0 |
0.8 |
|
5.9 |
0.5 |
|
K-limited yield; yield without K fertilizer (t ha−1) |
5.7 |
0.7 |
|
5.6 |
0.3 |
|
Yield
response to N (t ha−1) |
2.4 |
0.9 |
|
2.3 |
0.8 |
|
Yield
response to P (t ha−1) |
0.5 |
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
0.2 |
|
Yield
response to K (t ha−1) |
0.8 |
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
0.3 |
SSNM-based nutrient requirements
The SSNM
approach was used to estimate fertilizer N and P2O5
requirements from Table 1. Total fertilizer N required for rice
(Table 2) was estimated from the measured response to N (Table
1) and assumed target agronomic efficiency of N (kg yield
increase kg fertilizer N−1) of 20 for both the
kuruvai and thaladi seasons. See
N management for more details.
Total
fertilizer P2O5 and K2O were
estimated from attainable yield target, P-limited yield, and
K-limited yield (Table 1) using the
nutrient decision support system (NuDSS) software. Straw
input was estimated as 1 t ha−1 for the kuruvai
season and 2 t ha−1 for the thaladi season.
Table 2.
Fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O
requirements for rice estimated from results with the nutrient
omission plot technique in the Old and New Delta in Tamil Nadu,
India, 2002 to 2004.
Values
shown are means and standard deviation (SD) of 25–40 farms
per location and season.
|
Location and parameter |
Kuruvai
(dry
season) |
|
Thaladi
(wet
season) |
|
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Old Delta (Aduthurai District) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
fertilizer N required (kg ha−1) |
115 |
30 |
|
119 |
39 |
|
Total
fertilizer P2O5 required (kg ha−1) |
29 |
4 |
|
27 |
3 |
|
Total
K2O required (kg ha−1) |
64 |
14 |
|
50 |
11 |
|
New Delta (Thanjavur District) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
fertilizer N required (kg ha−1) |
120 |
44 |
|
115 |
38 |
|
Total
fertilizer P2O5 required (kg ha−1) |
31 |
5 |
|
28 |
3 |
|
Total
K2O required (kg ha−1) |
72 |
15 |
|
53 |
13 |
back to top
|