HOME | ABOUT US | COUNTRY LOCATIONS | PUBLICATIONS | DONORS | PARTNERS | FAQs | CONTACT US

 
 

back to

India map

 

Tamil Nadu, India

 

 

 

Research Results

 

 
     

Attainable yield and nutrient deficits

The nutrient omission plot technique was used to determine attainable yield with full fertilization and nutrient-limited yields. Table 1 shows the results in 2002 to 2004. Rice grain yield in plots fully fertilized with N, P, and K, provided an estimate of the attainable yield target. The yield of rice not fertilized with N, but fertilized with other nutrients, was used to determine N-limited yield. Similarly, the yield of rice not fertilized with P, but receiving other nutrients, indicated P-limited yield; and the yield of rice not fertilized with K, but receiving other nutrients, indicated K-limited yield. The difference between the yield target and a nutrient-limited yield indicated the crop response to the nutrient. Crop response to P averaged <0.5 t ha−1 in both the Old and New Delta for both kuruvai and thaladi seasons. Crop response to K averaged 0.5 t ha−1 for both kuruvai and thaladi in the Old Delta and >0.5 t ha−1 for both seasons in the New Delta.

Table 1. Attainable yield and nutrient deficits in the Old and New Delta in Tamil Nadu, 2002 to 2004. Values shown are means and standard deviation (SD) of 25–40 farms per location and season.

Location and parameter

Kuruvai

(dry season)

 

Thaladi

(wet season)

 

Mean

SD 

 

Mean

SD

Old Delta (Aduthurai District)

 

 

 

 

 

Attainable yield target; yield with NPK (t ha−1)

6.2

0.8

 

6.2

0.5

N-limited yield; yield without N fertilizer (t ha−1)

3.9

0.6

 

3.8

0.6

P-limited yield; yield without P fertilizer (t ha−1)

5.9

0.8

 

5.8

0.5

K-limited yield; yield without K fertilizer (t ha−1)

5.7

0.8

 

5.7

0.5

Yield response to N (t ha−1)

2.3

0.6

 

2.4

0.8

Yield response to P (t ha−1)

0.3

0.3

 

0.4

0.3

Yield response to K (t ha−1)

0.5

0.3

 

0.5

0.3

New Delta (Thanjavur District)

 

 

 

 

 

Attainable yield target; yield with NPK (t ha−1)

6.5

0.8

 

6.2

0.5

N-limited yield; yield without N fertilizer (t ha−1)

4.1

1.0

 

3.9

0.6

P-limited yield; yield without P fertilizer (t ha−1)

6.0

0.8

 

5.9

0.5

K-limited yield; yield without K fertilizer (t ha−1)

5.7

0.7

 

5.6

0.3

Yield response to N (t ha−1)

2.4

0.9

 

2.3

0.8

Yield response to P (t ha−1)

0.5

0.3

 

0.3

0.2

Yield response to K (t ha−1)

0.8

0.3

 

0.6

0.3

 

SSNM-based nutrient requirements

The SSNM approach was used to estimate fertilizer N and P2O5 requirements from Table 1. Total fertilizer N required for rice (Table 2) was estimated from the measured response to N (Table 1) and assumed target agronomic efficiency of N (kg yield increase kg fertilizer N−1) of 20 for both the kuruvai and thaladi seasons. See N management for more details.

Total fertilizer P2O5 and K2O were estimated from attainable yield target, P-limited yield, and K-limited yield (Table 1) using the nutrient decision support system (NuDSS) software. Straw input was estimated as 1 t ha−1 for the kuruvai season and 2 t ha−1 for the thaladi season.

 

Table 2. Fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O requirements for rice estimated from results with the nutrient omission plot technique in the Old and New Delta in Tamil Nadu, India, 2002 to 2004. Values shown are means and standard deviation (SD) of 25–40 farms per location and season.

Location and parameter

Kuruvai

(dry season)

 

Thaladi

(wet season)

 

Mean

SD

 

Mean

SD

Old Delta (Aduthurai District)

 

 

 

 

 

Total fertilizer N required (kg ha−1)

115

30

 

119

39

Total fertilizer P2O5 required (kg ha−1)

29

4

 

27

3

Total K2O required (kg ha−1)

64

14

 

50

11

New Delta (Thanjavur District)

 

 

 

 

 

Total fertilizer N required (kg ha−1)

120

44

 

115

38

Total fertilizer P2O5 required (kg ha−1)

31

5

 

28

3

Total K2O required (kg ha−1)

72

15

 

53

13

 

 

back to top