HOME | ABOUT US | COUNTRY LOCATIONS | PUBLICATIONS | DONORS | PARTNERS | FAQs | CONTACT US

 
 

back to

Vietnam map

 

Mekong River Delta, Vietnam

 

 

 

Research Results

 

 
     

Attainable yield and nutrient deficits with inbred rice in the Mekong Delta

The nutrient omission plot technique was used to determine attainable yield with full fertilization and nutrient-limited yields. Table 1 shows the results averaged for three provinces in 2002–03. Rice grain yield in plots fully fertilized with N, P, and K provided an estimate of the attainable yield target, which was higher in the dry than wet season. The yield of rice not fertilized with N but fertilized with other nutrients was used to determine N-limited yield. Similarly, the yield of rice not fertilized with P but receiving other nutrients indicated P-limited yield; and the yield of rice not fertilized with K but receiving other nutrients indicated K-limited yield. The difference between the yield target and a nutrient-limited yield indicated the crop response to the nutrient. Crop response to P averaged 1.2 t ha−1 in the dry season and 0.8 t ha−1 in the wet season. The K-limited yield was not determined during this period.

Table 1. Attainable yield and nutrient deficits with inbred rice in alluvial soils in three provinces (An Giang, Cantho, and Tien Giang) of the Mekong Delta, 2002-03.

Parameter

Dry season

(n = 56)

 

Wet season

(n = 25)

 

Mean

SD

 

Mean

SD

Attainable yield target; yield with NPK (t ha−1)

6.5

0.9

 

4.2

0.5

N-limited yield; yield without N fertilizer (t ha−1)

4.2

0.7

 

2.7

0.5

P-limited yield; yield without P fertilizer (t ha−1)

5.3

0.8

 

3.5

0.6

Yield response to N (t ha−1)

2.3

0.7

 

1.6

0.6

Yield response to P (t ha−1)

1.2

0.5

 

0.8

0.5

SD = standard deviation; n = number of replicated plots

 

SSNM-based nutrient requirements

The SSNM approach was used to estimate fertilizer N and P2O5 requirements from Table 1. The fertilizer K2O requirement for the wet season was estimated from data obtained in 1997 and 1998 in Cantho Province. Total fertilizer N required for rice (Table 2) was estimated from the measured response to N (Table 1) and assumed target agronomic efficiency of N (kg yield increase kg−1 fertilizer N) of 25 for the dry season and 18 for wet season. See N management for more details.

Total fertilizer P2O5 and K2O were estimated from attainable yield target, P-limited yield (Table 1), and K-limited yield (data not shown) using the nutrient decision support system (NuDSS). Straw input was estimated as 0.5 t ha−1 for both seasons.

 

Table 2. Fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O requirements for rice in alluvial soil estimated from results with the nutrient omission plot technique in three provinces in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, 2002-03.

Parameter

Dry season

 

Wet season

 

(n = 56)

 

(n = 25)

 

Mean

SD

 

Mean

 

SD

 

Total fertilizer N required (kg ha−1)

91

26

 

86

 

32

 

Total fertilizer P2O5 required (kg ha−1)

33

7

 

25

 

21

 

Total K2O required (kg ha−1)

 

 

 

27

*

20

*

SD = standard deviation; n = number of replicated plots

* Determined from data collected in 1997 and 1998 in Cantho Province (n = 36).

On-farm evaluation of SSNM in alluvial soil 

In SSNM, fertilizer N is applied several times during the season based on crop needs as determined by the leaf color chart (LCC). Fertilizer P is all applied within 21 days after sowing (DAS); and fertilizer K is applied twice about 50% before 21 DAS and 50% at early panicle initiation. Rice yields averaged by year and season for each of the three provinces were mostly higher with SSNM as compared with the farmers’ fertilizer practice (FFP) (Fig. 2). Table 3 shows the total amount of fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O applied per season in 2001-04 with FFP and SSNM.

No Caption for figure 2

of fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O applied to rice per season with the farmers’ fertilizer practice (FFP) and site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam in 2001-04. Values shown are the means and standard deviation of 26-40 replicates per province.

Province

Fertilizer applied with FFP

 

Fertilizer applied with SSNM

 

N

P2O5

K2O

 

N

P2O5

K2O

 

------------ kg ha1 -----------

 

------------ kg ha1 -------------

Dry season

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An Giang

106 ± 12

49 ± 11

55 ± 15

 

99 ± 5

39 ± 9

40 ± 7

Cantho

111 ± 19

47 ± 12

44 ± 13

 

99 ± 11

36 ± 9

44 ± 6

Tien Giang

108 ± 15

44 ± 12

48 ± 20

 

103 ± 8

42 ± 5

44 ± 6

All

108 ± 15

47 ± 12

49 ± 17

 

100 ± 8

39 ± 8

43 ± 7

Wet season

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An Giang

101 ± 16

50 ± 14

51 ± 18

 

89 ± 8

44 ± 4

38 ± 5

Cantho

107 ± 13

46 ± 10

44 ± 14

 

86 ± 4

45 ± 5

36 ± 8

Tien Giang

99 ± 9

43 ± 11

48 ± 13

 

90 ± 7

48 ± 5

43 ± 5

All

102 ± 13

46 ± 12

48 ± 15

 

88 ± 7

46 ± 5

39 ± 7

 

 

back to top