SITE-SPECIFIC NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (SSNM)
Mekong River Delta, Vietnam
Team Leader
Dr. Pham Sy Tan
Deputy Director
Cuu Long Delta Rice Research Institute (CLRRI)
Division of Agronomy
Omon, Cantho
Email: pstan@hcm.vnn.vn
Partner Institution
Cuu Long Delta Rice Research Institute
Site Characteristics
The Mekong River Delta (MRD) in southern Vietnam accounts for about 50% of the national rice production and almost all of the Vietnamese rice exports. The MRD is well suited for rice cultivation because of its flat topography, abundant freshwater sources, and many fertile alluvial soils.
Farmers in the Mekong River Delta typically grow two to three rice crops per year, depending on the duration of flooding in the second half of each year.
In An Giang Province, farmers grow two rice crops per year:
Dry season rice from December to March. This is the high-yielding season.
Wet season rice from May to August. This is the low-yielding season.
In Cantho and Tien Giang, farmers grow up to three rice crops per year:
Dry season rice from November to February
Early wet season rice from February to May
Late wet season rice from June to August
Rice in the MRD is commonly established by broadcasting germinated seed, often at high seed rates (≥ 200 kg ha−1).
The MRD has a monsoon climate with high temperatures throughout the year (average 27 °C) and high solar radiation. Annual rainfall ranges from 1500 to 2000 mm.
Development and Evaluation of SSNM
Research on SSNM in the MRD started in 1997 in Cantho Province. In 2002, activities expanded to An Giang and Tien Giang Provinces (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. The sites for the development and evaluation of SSNM in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam.
Attainable yield and nutrient deficits with inbred rice in the Mekong Delta
The nutrient omission plot technique was used to determine attainable yield with full fertilization and nutrient-limited yields. Table 1 shows the results averaged for three provinces in 2002–03. Rice grain yield in plots fully fertilized with N, P, and K provided an estimate of the attainable yield target, which was higher in the dry than wet season. The yield of rice not fertilized with N but fertilized with other nutrients was used to determine N-limited yield. Similarly, the yield of rice not fertilized with P but receiving other nutrients indicated P-limited yield; and the yield of rice not fertilized with K but receiving other nutrients indicated K-limited yield. The difference between the yield target and a nutrient-limited yield indicated the crop response to the nutrient. Crop response to P averaged 1.2 t ha−1 in the dry season and 0.8 t ha−1 in the wet season. The K-limited yield was not determined during this period.
Table 1. Attainable yield and nutrient deficits with inbred rice in alluvial soils in three provinces (An Giang, Cantho, and Tien Giang) of the Mekong Delta, 2002-03.
|
Parameter |
Dry season (n = 56) |
|
Wet season (n = 25) |
||
|
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Attainable yield target; yield with NPK (t ha−1) |
6.5 |
0.9 |
|
4.2 |
0.5 |
|
N-limited yield; yield without N fertilizer (t ha−1) |
4.2 |
0.7 |
|
2.7 |
0.5 |
|
P-limited yield; yield without P fertilizer (t ha−1) |
5.3 |
0.8 |
|
3.5 |
0.6 |
|
Yield response to N (t ha−1) |
2.3 |
0.7 |
|
1.6 |
0.6 |
|
Yield response to P (t ha−1) |
1.2 |
0.5 |
|
0.8 |
0.5 |
SD = standard deviation; n = number of replicated plots
SSNM-based nutrient requirements
The SSNM approach was used to estimate fertilizer N and P2O5 requirements from Table 1. The fertilizer K2O requirement for the wet season was estimated from data obtained in 1997 and 1998 in Cantho Province. Total fertilizer N required for rice (Table 2) was estimated from the measured response to N (Table 1) and assumed target agronomic efficiency of N (kg yield increase kg−1 fertilizer N) of 25 for the dry season and 18 for wet season. See N management for more details.
Total fertilizer P2O5 and K2O were estimated from attainable yield target, P-limited yield (Table 1), and K-limited yield (data not shown) using the nutrient decision support system (NuDSS).
Straw input was estimated as 0.5 t ha−1 for both seasons.
Table 2. Fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O requirements for rice in alluvial soil estimated from results with the nutrient omission plot technique in three provinces in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam, 2002-03.
|
Parameter |
Dry season |
|
Wet season |
||||
|
|
(n = 56) |
|
(n = 25) |
||||
|
|
Mean |
SD |
|
Mean |
|
SD |
|
|
Total fertilizer N required (kg ha−1) |
91 |
26 |
|
86 |
|
32 |
|
|
Total fertilizer P2O5 required (kg ha−1) |
33 |
7 |
|
25 |
|
21 |
|
|
Total K2O required (kg ha−1) |
|
|
|
27 |
* |
20 |
* |
SD = standard deviation; n = number of replicated plots
* Determined from data collected in 1997 and 1998 in Cantho Province (n = 36).
On-farm evaluation of SSNM in alluvial soil
In SSNM, fertilizer N is applied several times during the season based on crop needs as determined by the leaf color chart (LCC). Fertilizer P is all applied within 21 days after sowing (DAS); and fertilizer K is applied twice about 50% before 21 DAS and 50% at early panicle initiation. Rice yields averaged by year and season for each of the three provinces were mostly higher with SSNM as compared with the farmers’ fertilizer practice (FFP) (Fig. 2). Table 3 shows the total amount of fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O applied per season in 2001-04 with FFP and SSNM.

Fig. 2. Performance of
SSNM as compared with the farmers’ fertilizer practice in the three provinces of
the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. * indicates a significant difference between the two
treatments at P<0.05 in a given year.
Table 3. Total
amount of fertilizer N, P2O5, and K2O applied
to rice per season with the farmers’ fertilizer practice (FFP) and site-specific
nutrient management (SSNM) in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam in 2001-04.
Values shown are the means and standard deviation of 26-40 replicates per
province.
|
Province |
Fertilizer applied with FFP |
|
Fertilizer applied with SSNM |
||||
|
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|
N |
P2O5 |
K2O |
|
|
------------- kg ha−1 -------------- |
|
------------- kg ha−1 -------------- |
||||
|
Dry season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An Giang |
106 ± 12 |
49 ± 11 |
55 ± 15 |
|
99 ± 5 |
39 ± 9 |
40 ± 7 |
|
Cantho |
111 ± 19 |
47 ± 12 |
44 ± 13 |
|
99 ± 11 |
36 ± 9 |
44 ± 6 |
|
Tien Giang |
108 ± 15 |
44 ± 12 |
48 ± 20 |
|
103 ± 8 |
42 ± 5 |
44 ± 6 |
|
All |
108 ± 15 |
47 ± 12 |
49 ± 17 |
|
100 ± 8 |
39 ± 8 |
43 ± 7 |
|
Wet season |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An Giang |
101 ± 16 |
50 ± 14 |
51 ± 18 |
|
89 ± 8 |
44 ± 4 |
38 ± 5 |
|
Cantho |
107 ± 13 |
46 ± 10 |
44 ± 14 |
|
86 ± 4 |
45 ± 5 |
36 ± 8 |
|
Tien Giang |
99 ± 9 |
43 ± 11 |
48 ± 13 |
|
90 ± 7 |
48 ± 5 |
43 ± 5 |
|
All |
102 ± 13 |
46 ± 12 |
48 ± 15 |
|
88 ± 7 |
46 ± 5 |
39 ± 7 |
Locally Adapted Recommendation for Alluvial Soil in the Mekong Delta
Results from the nutrient omission plot technique, on-farm evaluations of SSNM, and interviews with farmers were used to formulate locally adapted recommendations for managing N, P, and K.
The rates of fertilizer P2O5 as determined from nutrient omission plots may have to be adjusted depending upon previous use of fertilizer P and water management. The rate of fertilizer P in both seasons is increased by 10 kg P2O5 ha−1 if the amount of fertilizer P used in previous seasons was <30 kg P2O5 ha−1. The fertilizer P rate in the wet season is increased for fields that are not continuously flooded and undergo alternate soil drying and wetting. Table 4 gives the recommended rates of fertilizer P2O5 for alluvial soil. Rates would be higher for acid sulfate soil.
Table 4. Adjustments in the SSNM recommended rates of fertilizer P2O5 for alluvial soil based on previous fertilizer P use and water management during the dry season.
|
Fertilizer P2O5 use in previous seasons (kg ha−1) |
Recommended fertilizer P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||
|
Dry season |
Wet season |
||
|
|
Continuously flooded soil |
Alternately wet and dry soil |
|
|
≥ 30 |
30 |
25 |
40 |
|
< 30 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
Locally adapted SSNM recommendations for wet-seeded rice with growth durations of 95 to 100 days and 90 days in both dry and wet seasons are available at the links below.
SSNM recommendation for wet-seeded rice with growth duration of 95 to 100 days
Version 1 [PDF 159KB]
SSNM recommendation for wet-seeded rice with growth duration of 90 days
Version 1 [PDF 158KB]
Mekong River Delta SSNM version 1.0 (www.irri.org/irrc/ssnm)